← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./32090/2025bail granted

Sugan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2025-07-23Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32090 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-126 Year-2024 Thana- ASANWA District- Siwan ====================================================== 1.

Sugan Yadav S/o- Late Raghuveer Yadav Resident of vill- Katwar PSAsaon Dist- Siwan 2.

Manmohan Yadav S/o- Sugan Yadav Resident of vill- Katwar PS- Asaon Dist- Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kumari Anupam For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Madhura Nand Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 23-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Assaon P.S. Case No. 126 of 2024 dated 02.11.2024 registered for the offences punishable under section 103(2) of the BNS.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners and the co-accused persons are alleged to have assaulted the informant's brother by means of knife, lathi, hockey, fists and slaps as a result of which he succumbed to the injury.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32090 of 2025(2) dt.23-07-2025 2/2 implicated in this case. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. There is no specific allegation of assault against the petitioners. The petitioners have no concern with the alleged occurrence. The other co-accused persons have already been granted bail by this court vide order dated 27.03.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 15083/2025. The petitioner no. 1 has one antecedent whereas the petitioner no. 2 has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioners are in custody since 23.02.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition of the petitioners.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioners above-named, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Siwan in connection with Assaon P.S. Case No. 126 of 2024.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) atul/- U T