Bihar Rajya Dharmik Parishad K v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 4652 of 2002 =========================================================== 1.
Bihar Rajya Dharmik Parishad Karamchari Sangh, Vidyapathi Marg, P.S. Kotwali, Town and District- Patna through its General Secretary. 2.
Gopal Lal Das S/o Late Janki Lal Das Resident of Village- Ramapatti, P.S. Rajnagar, District- Madhubani.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary Old Secretariat Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. Secretary Department of Revenue, Old Secretariat Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. Secretary Department of Finance, Old Secretariat Government of Bihar, Patna.
4. The Law Secretary-cum-Legal Remembrancer Old Secretariat Government of Bihar, Patna.
5. The Bihar State Board of Religious Trust through its Chairman Vidyapathi Marg, Patna.
6. The Superintendent, Bihar State Religious Trust Board, Vidyapathi Marg, Patna.
.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.
For the State :
Mr. Nagendra Prasad Yadav, S.C. 23 Mr. Rohit Mishra, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 15-12-2016 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the State has assisted the Court on the basis of averments made in the last counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent no. 2, in which it has been stated that some payment has been made to the Bihar Board of Religious Trust (hereinafter referred to as the 'Board') and with regard to the further dues, relating to acquisition of surplus land of various trusts registered with the Board, the Collector of various Districts have been asked to submit a report so that the follow up action may be taken by
Patna High Court CWJC No.4652 of 2002 dt.15-12-2016 2/2 the Department and payment made.
In view of the aforesaid, as payments have already started and the State authorities are pursuing the matter, the Court does not deem it necessary to keep the writ petition pending. Accordingly, the writ application stands disposed off with a direction to the respondents to ensure that whatever due amount is payable to the Board be so done, in accordance with law, expeditiously.
(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar AFR/NAFR U