← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/14931/2013dismiss for nonprosecution

Chitrasen Thakur v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2025-09-04Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14931 of 2013 ====================================================== Chitrasen Thakur Son Of Late Bindi Thakur @ Bindeshwar Thakur Resident Of Village - Lalmaniya, Police Station - Laukaha (Lalmaniya), District - Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Darbhanga 3.

The Superintending Engineer, Western Koshi Canal Circle, Jainagar, Police Station - Jainagar, District-Madhubani.

4.

The Executive Engineer, Munhara Barrage Division, Jainagar, Police Station - Jainagar, District - Madhubani.

5.

The District Compassionate Committee, Madhubani, Through Its Chairman 6.

Pramila Devi Wife Of Late Bindi Jha @ Bindeshwar Thakur Resident Of Village - Lalmaniya, Police Station - Laukaha (Lalmaniya), District - Madhubani 7.

Vijay Thakur, Son of Late Bindi Jha alias Bindeshwar Thakur, resident of Village- Lalmaniya, Police Station- Laukaha (Lalmaniya), DistrictMadhubani. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Prashant Pratap, GP-2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 04-09-2025 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondents is present.

2. No one had appeared on behalf of the petitioner on 24.10.2024, 25.11.2024 and 20.8.2025 also.

3. On 20.8.2025, the following order was passed :- "No one appears on behalf of the petitioner.

2. Learned counsel for the Respondent-

Patna High Court CWJC No.14931 of 2013(7) dt.04-09-2025 2/2 State is present.

3. This is an old matter of the 2013 and still the petitioner is not present to press the writ application.

4. As a measure of last indulgence, this case is being adjourned with a clear stipulation that if on the next date also the petitioner does not press the writ application then the Court may consider dismissing this case for non-prosecution.

5. Put up this case on 03.09.2025."

4. As no one appears on behalf of the petitioner, the case is dismissed for non-prosecution.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Shiv/- U