← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./63009/2018disposed

Kanti Devi @ Punam Devi And ORS v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2026-07-07Mr. Justice Sunil Dutta Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63009 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-122 Year-2014 Thana- DULHIN BAZAR District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

Kanti Devi @ Punam Devi and Ors Wife of Vijiay Kumar, 2.

Vijay Kumar @ Vijay Kumar Singh, Son of late Jagdish Singh, 3.

Shailendra Kumar @ Shailendra Kumar Singh, Son of Vijay Kumar, All Resident of Village- Achhua, Police Station- Dulhin Bazar, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Awdhesh Singh, Son of Late Jagdish Singh, Resident of Village and P.O.- Achhua, Police Station- Dulhin Bazar, District- Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Surendra Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Binod Kumar 2, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 07-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The present Cr. Misc. Application has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing the order dated 30.01.2017 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Danapur, Patna in Dulhin Bazar P.S. Case No.122 of 2014.

3. As per the report received from the learned Trial Court dated 24.04.2026, five witnesses have been examined in this case out of total 10 charge-sheeted witnesses including the informant of the case.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63009 of 2018(3) dt.07-07-2026 2/2 case may be disposed of with the liberty to the petitioners to raise all the issues in this petition before the learned Trial Court at the appropriate stage in accordance with law.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has no objection to this prayer of the petitioners.

6. Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, the present Cr. Misc. Application stands disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner, as prayed for. (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) Utkarsh.k/- U T