Prasant Kumar Singh @ Mantu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32645 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-33 Year-2022 Thana- PANCHRUKHI District- Siwan ====================================================== 1.

Prasant Kumar Singh @ Mantu S/O Ghanshyam Singh Resident Of VillageBariyarpur, P.S.- Pachrukhi, District- Siwan 2.

Shashank Kumar @ Pinku @ Shashank Raj Kumar Rai S/O Ghanshyam Singh Resident Of Village- Bariyarpur, P.S.- Pachrukhi, District- Siwan 3.

Shyam Sundri Devi W/O Late Raghunandan Singh Resident Of VillageBariyarpur, P.S.- Pachrukhi, District- Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Raghav Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Satyendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 14-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 447, 354, 307, 379, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioners along with other accused persons are said to have assaulted the son of the informant by means of lathi, danda and sharp edged weapon, as a result of which, he received injury. It is further alleged that petitioner no. 1 tore the cloth of the informant and also assaulted her on her left hand. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32645 of 2022(3) dt.14-11-2022 2/2 this case due to land dispute. He submits that occurrence took place on 26.01.2022 but the FIR has been lodged on 09.02.2022 i.e. after 15 days delay and there is no explanation for such delay. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioners. He submits that petitioners and informant are the agnates. He further submits that petitioners have criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that there is delay in filing the FIR, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Pachrukhi P.S. Case No. 33 of 2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T