Mantosh Kumar @ Mantosh Kumar Ram v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33753 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-193 Year-2024 Thana- KURSAILA District- Katihar ====================================================== Mantosh Kumar @ Mantosh Kumar Ram S/O Rajendra Ram VillageChandpur Pothiya, PS- Falka, District- Katihar, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Apurv Harsh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Renuka Ratnakar(App125) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 08-10-2025 Heard the parties.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kursela P.S. Case No. 193 of 2024 registered for the offences under Sections 8, 20(B)(ii)(C) of the NDPS Act.
3. The petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and is in custody since 26.02.2025.
4. The allegation against the petitioner is to have in possession of 58 kilograms of contraband i.e., ganja along with other co-accused persons, where alleged contraband was recovered from the under-constructed house of this petitioner.
5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that in the present case charge-sheet was submitted by investigating agency without obtaining FSL report and, therefore,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33753 of 2025(4) dt.08-10-2025 2/3 the petitioner is entitled for default bail. It is further submitted that as issue is pending before Hon'ble Supreme court for larger consideration in the matter of Divyas Bardewa Vs. Narcotics Control Bureau through SLA (Crl.) No. 11628 of 2022 and by considering aforesaid, different learned Co-ordinate Benches of this Court are granting bail to co-accused persons, where chargesheet was submitted without FSL report this petitioner also deserves bail. It is also submitted that even preliminary test was not conducted at the time of seizure and sampling of alleged contraband to ascertain prima-facie that recovered contraband was ganja or not. It is also pointed out that the FIR, itself suggests that mandatory provisions regarding search, seizure and sampling (SSS) not appears followed in the present case. It is also submitted that recovery also not appears made from the conscious physical possession of this petitioner. While concluding the argument it is submitted that petitioner is a man of clean antecedent.
6. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the State, while opposing the prayer for bail submitted that commercial quantity of contraband i.e., ganja was recovered from under-constructed house of this petitioner. However he could not disputed the legal and factual submission as submitted aforesaid.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33753 of 2025(4) dt.08-10-2025 3/3
7. In view of aforesaid factual submission and by taking note of fact as incomplete charge-sheet was submitted against petitioner i.e., without FSL report, coupled with the fact as petitioner is a man of clean antecedent and remains in custody since 26.02.2025, accordingly above named petitioner, is directed to be released on bail in connection with Kursela P.S. Case No. 193 of 2024 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge (NDPS Act) cum Principal District and Sessions Judge, Katihar/concerned court, subject to the conditions as mentioned under Section 480(3) of the B.N.S.S. (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) Sudha/- U T