Bhaiya Ram @ Bhai Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33252 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-39 Year-2019 Thana- CHHAURADANO District- East Champaran ====================================================== BHAIYA RAM @ BHAI RAM, Son of Late Ram Dayal Ram, Resident of Village - Akdari, P.S.- Chhauradano, Dist.- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Umesh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Pronoti Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 01-08-2019 Petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in connection with Chhauradano P.S. Case No. 39 of 2019 registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

Police got information that some miscreants were carrying liquor and apprehended one accused and others succeeded fled away and apprehended person has named the petitioner and other accused persons who fled away and police recovered 132 litres of Nepali liquor.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that there is nothing against him except confessional statement of co-accused and he has no criminal antecedent. Heard learned APP, who has opposed the prayer for

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33252 of 2019(2) dt.01-08-2019 2/2 anticipatory bail but conceded that there is no recovery from the possession of the petitioner.

In view of above facts and circumstances, let petitioner, in the event of arrest or surrender, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Special Judge, Excise, East Champaran, Motihari, in connection with Chhauradano P.S. Case No. 39 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and further condition is that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immoveable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U T