Dilip Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34721 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3700 Year-2022 Thana- SARAN COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSaran ====================================================== Dilip Kumar S/O PRAMOD SINGH Resident of Village- Mirpur Zuara, P.S.- AWATAR NAGAR, DIST- SARAN ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
ANITA KUWAR WIFE OF LATE JALESHWAR SINGH R/O VILLAGEBARBANNA, P.S.- DIGHWARA, DIST- SARAN ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Kumar Samarjeet Singh, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, APP Mr. Vijay Kumar, Adv ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 09-12-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned APP for the State. 2.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable u/s 323, 379, 498A of the I.P.C and Section 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act but cognizance has been taken only under Sections 498A/34 of the IPC. 3.
Petitioner, who is husband of daughter of opposite party no2., is said to have ousted her daughter from her matrimonial home in association of his family members over the dowry demand.
4.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is an innocent person and has committed no offence. Petitioner has neither made any dowry demand nor
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34721 of 2024(5) dt.09-12-2024 2/2 drove the daughter of complainant out of her matrimonial home nor tormented her over the demand of dowry. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006 (3) PLJR 182. 5.
In that view of the matter, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Complaint Case No.3700 of 2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
6.
If so advised, either of the parties will be at liberty to make an application before the learned Court below for referring the matter to the District Mediation Center for the purpose of reconciliation or for one time settlement.
7.
Accordingly, this application stands disposed of. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T