Parmeshwar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33319 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-37 Year-2013 Thana- DUMARIYA District- Gaya ====================================================== Parmeshwar Yadav S/o Raudi Yadav @ Krishana Yadav R/o Village- Sevra, P.S.- Maigra,District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Vijay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Uday Chand Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH ORAL ORDER 27-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has filed the instant application for grant of regular bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 342, 307, 353, 435, 427, 120(B) of IPC and Section 17 of CLA Act.
3. Prosecution case in nutshell is that the mob was making protest against the establishment of police camp. It is further alleged that the mob attacked on the police personnel, pelted stones causing injuries and put the vehicle on fire.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33319 of 2025(2) dt.27-05-2025 2/3 petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. There is no specific allegation against the petitioner rather the allegation levelled against him is general and omnibus. He has no concern with the alleged occurrence and his name has been incorporated in the instant case merely on the ground that his house is situated near the place of occurrence. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 13.12.2024. Similarly situated several co-accused persons have already been granted bail by different coordinate Benches of this Court.
5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for Bail and submitted that petitioner has one antecedent.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the above facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33319 of 2025(2) dt.27-05-2025 3/3 this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Dumaria P.S. Case No. 37 of 2013 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Sherghati at Gaya, with following condition:- (i) One of the bailors should be close relative or family member of the petitioner.
(S. B. Pd. Singh, J) Nirajkrs/- U T