Patna High CourtCR. MISC./30681/2020bail granted

Nand Lal Pawan v. The State Of Bihar

2021-10-04Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30681 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-654 Year-2018 Thana- MASAUDHI District- Patna ====================================================== Nand Lal Pawan Son of Baban Paswan Resident of Village-Adampur (Pipalwan), P.S.-Naubatpur, District-Patna ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Ansul, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr.A.G.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 04-10-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was refused by this Court vide order dated 3.2.2020, passed in Cr.Misc.No. 43047/2019.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that similarly situated co-accused have already been allowed bail by different co-ordinate benches of this Court vide orders dated 10.6.2020 and 12.8.2021, passed in Cr.Misc.No. 48700/2019 and 15687/2021 respectively. It is further submitted that charge has already been framed and the petitioner is in custody since 30.3.2019.

Considering the submissions of the parties, custody of the petitioner and the fact that charge has already been framed, prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Let the petitioner, mentioned above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30681 of 2020(9) dt.04-10-2021 2/2 Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Danapur (Patna) in Masaurhi Police Station Case No. 654 of 2018 on the following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Shashi U T