Haradhan Saha v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30811 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-61 Year-2026 Thana- BARARI District- Katihar ====================================================== Haradhan Saha Son of Chumu Sahu @ Chamu Saha Resident of VillageMaharani Rounia, P.S.- Barari, District- Katihar (but in the impugned order it has wrongly been typed as Residents of Village- Maheshlitti, P.S.- Kadma, District- Godda (Jharkhand) which is clear from FIR itself) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bimal Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Umesh Lal Verma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 07-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Barari P.S. Case No. 61 of 2026 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 109, 351(2), 352, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the petitioner along with other has abused the informant and one Vibhash Kumar Saha has assaulted with the butt of the country made pistol on the head of the informant.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30811 of 2026(2) dt.07-05-2026 2/2 case. He also submits that there is also a counter version of this case. The nature of allegation is general and omnibus. He further submits that there is no allegation of firing against this petitioner. Moreover, a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 07.03.2026.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Katihar in connection with Barari P.S. Case No. 61 of 2026.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T