Patna High CourtCR. MISC./30869/2020rejected

Vikash Rai @ Vikash Kumar Yadav @ Vikash Ray v. The State Of Bihar

2021-01-19Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30869 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-185 Year-2020 Thana- BHAGWAN BAZAR District- Saran ====================================================== VIKASH RAI @ VIKASH KUMAR YADAV @ VIKASH RAY Son of Satyendra Rai @ Satyendra Yadav @ Satyendra Ray Resident of Village - Ajaibgang, P.S.- Bhagwan Bazar, District - Saran at Chapra. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sharda Nand Mishra, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Bhanu Pratap Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 19-01-2021 Heard both sides.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Bhagwan Bazar P.S. Case No.185 of 2020 registered under Sections 341, 323, 354, 354D, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The victim alleged that she is a student of 12th class and she used to go to take tuition but the petitioner eve-teased her. The petitioner used to call her while she was in her house. When on disclosure made by the victim the mother of the victim went to the house of the petitioner, the petitioner assaulted her and threatened that no action will be taken against him. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was having love affairs with the victim and they were on talking term. The occurrence is said to have taken place

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30869 of 2020(3) dt.19-01-2021 2/2 during the lockdown period. No date of occurrence is mentioned in the F.I.R. but it appears that victim made categorical statement that the petitioner used to continuously eve-teased her while she was going to take tuition and when she disclosed the fact to her mother and her mother went to complain, the petitioner assaulted her mother. The call detail report has also been obtained and it transpired that the petitioner used to call the victim.

Taking into consideration the facts aforesaid, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the same is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) Saurabh/- U T