Pappu Kumar Rai @ Pappu Kumar @ Pappu Ray v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 30621 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-321 Year-2025 Thana- AWTARNAGAR District- Saran ====================================================== 1.
Pappu Kumar Rai @ Pappu Kumar @ Pappu Ray son of Late Premdhar Ray Resident of Village- Maujampur Phulwariya Tola P.S -Awatarnagar District -Saran at Chapra 2.
Kunal Rai son of Ramgir Ray Resident of Village- Maujampur Phulwariya Tola P.S -Awatarnagar District -Saran at Chapra 3.
Jitu Rai @ Jiut Rai son of late Premdhar Ray Resident of VillageMaujampur Phulwariya Tola P.S -Awatarnagar District -Saran at Chapra 4.
Ramgir Ray son of Late Premdhar Ray Resident of Village- Maujampur Phulwariya Tola P.S -Awatarnagar District -Saran at Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Uday Chand Prasad, APP Mr. Harendra Kumar, Adv.for Informant ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.P.P for the State and learned counsel for the informant.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case, registered for offence punishable under Sections 126(1), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 103(1), 76, 303(2), 351(2), 351(2), 352, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.
3. As per F.I.R., on 06.12.2025 at about 4 PM, the father-in-law of informant was at his Grocery shop, in the meantime, these petitioners along with other co-accused persons, armed with Farsa, iron rod, Lathi, Danda, came and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 30621 of 2026(3) dt.02-07-2026 2/2 started abusing him and thereafter, brutally assaulted him, due to which, he became unconscious and when informant and other family members went for rescue, they were also assaulted by accused persons. The accused persons also disrobed the informant and snatched her gold-ring, gold Mangalsutra & Jiutia (gold locket) and also took away Rs. 13,000/- cash from the box, kept in the shop. The father-in-law of the informant died during course of treatment.
4. Considering the nature of accusation, the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioners is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay U T