Rajeshwar Dayal v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15334 of 2013 ====================================================== Rajeshwar Dayal Son of Late Shiveshwar Dayal Sinha Resident Of B - 42, Kankarbagh, Housing Colony, P.S. Kankarbagh, District - Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Old Secretariat, Patna. 2.
The Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Government Of Bihar, Vikas Bhawan, Patna 3.
The Director, Panchayati Raj Department, Government Of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, Patna 4.
The State Election Commission, Bihar, Sone Bhawan, 3rd Floor, Patna Through Its Commissioner 5.
The State Election Commissioner, Bihar, Sone Bhawan, 3rd Floor, Patna 6.
The Secretary, State Election Commission, Bihar, Sone Bhawan, 3rd Floor, Patna 7.
The Deputy Secretary, State Election Commission, Bihar, Sone Bhawan, 3rd Floor, Patna 8.
Shri Sanjeev Kumar Son Of Shri Tapeshwar Prasad Verma, Computer Operator, State Election Commission, Bihar, Sone Bhawan ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
None For the State :
Mr. Kumar Alok, SC- 7 For State Election Commission :
Mr. Girish Pandey, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 04-09-2025 No one appears for the petitioner.
2. Learned counsel for the respondents are present.
3. No one appeared for the petitioner on 25.11.2024 and again on 20.08.2025 when the following order was passed:- "No one appears for the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the State and State Election Commission are present.
2. This is an old matter of the year 2013
Patna High Court CWJC No.15334 of 2013(7) dt.04-09-2025 2/2 and still the petitioner is not taking interest to press the writ application. By way of last indulgence, the case is being adjourned and if on the next date also the petitioner does not press the writ application, then the Court may consider dismissing it for nonprosecution.
3. Put up this case on 03.09.2025."
4. In view of the above, the application is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Partha Sarthy, J) sauravkrsinha/- U