← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/8891/2015dfd for non appearance

Md. Daud Mian @ Md. Daud And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2025-02-17Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8891 of 2015 ====================================================== 1.

Md. Daud Mian @ Md. Daud and Ors son of Md. Alim Mian 2.

Seikh Farooque Mian @ Md. Farooque son of Najbul Mian 3.

Harilal Paswan, son of Telu Paswan null 4.

Seikh Najbul Mian @ Md. Najbul son of Alam Mian 5.

Nooresa Khatoon, wife of Md. Ayub Mian.

6.

Md. Gaffar Mian @ Md. Gaffar son of Bedan Mian. 7.

Sahjahan Khatoon @ Sahjahan, W/o Md. Alimuddin. All residents of village P.S.-Kursa Kanta, District- Araria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Commissioner Purnea Division, Purnea.

3.

Addl. Collector, Araria.

4.

The D.C.L.R., Araria.

5.

The Collector, Araria.

6.

The Circle Officer Kusha Kanta, District- Araria. 7.

Bhoodan Yagya Committee through its Secretary, Patna. 8.

The Secretary, Bhoodan YAgya Committee, Patna. 9.

The Officer Secretary Bhoodan Yagya Committee, Araria. 10.

Krishna Kumar Verma, son of Late Budh Nath Das. 11.

Vishnu Prabhakar, son of Late Badhhi Nath Das. 12.

Kapil Kumar Verma, son of Late Budhni Nath Das 13.

Kaushik Kumar Verma, son of Late Buddhi Nath Das. 14.

Naresh Kumar Verma, son of Late Budhni Nath Das. All respondent of 9 to 14 resident of village- Kursa Kanta, P.S.- Kursa Kanta, District- Araria. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For Respondent Nos. 7 and 8 Mr. Kumar Shankaram ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 17-02-2025 None appeared on behalf of the petitioners, whereas the learned counsel for the Bhoodan Yagna Committee is in

Patna High Court CWJC No.8891 of 2015(7) dt.17-02-2025 2/2 attendance.

2. On previous dates as well, none had appeared on behalf of the petitioners.

3. In view of aforesaid, the writ application is dismissed in default.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) HR/- U