← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./31612/2022bail rejected

Ranjeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-12-06Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31612 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-63 Year-2022 Thana- BIBHUTIPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== Ranjeet Kumar Son Of Ram Naresh Rai Resient Of Village- Kalyanpur, P.S.- Bibhutipur, Disrict Samastipur In Connection With Bibhutipur, P.S. Case No. 63/2022.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kaushal Kishor For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rajendra Prasad Nat ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 06-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Bibhutipur P.S. Case no. 63 of 2022 instituted for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

Prosecution case relates to recovery of a motorcycle bearing registration no. BR-33AL-8019 and total 27 liters country made foreign liquor from the poultry farm of the petitioner.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31612 of 2022(3) dt.06-12-2022 2/2 implicated in this case. It is further submitted that Nitish Kumar is the registered owner of the vehicle in question which was recovered near the poultry form. Neither the petitioner was arrested on spot nor any incriminating article has been recovered from his conscious and constructive possession. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of bail and submitted that the illicit country made foreign liquor has been recovered from poultry farm of the petitioner. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration that the alleged poultry farm belongs to the petitioner, from where recovery of illegal liquor has been made, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner and, as such, his application for bail is rejected.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) amandeep/- U T