Boki Jat @ Jamamuddin @ Zamamuddin v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30930 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-132 Year-2025 Thana- FULKAHA District- Araria ====================================================== Boki Jat @ Jamamuddin @ Zamamuddin S/O Islam Jat R/O Village- Pathraha Ward No. 18, P.S- Fulkaha, Distt.- Araria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pramod Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bharat Bhushan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 01-07-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Fulkaha P.S.Case no. 132 of 2025 registered under sections 8 and 20(b)(ii)(c) of the NDPS Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, 25 kgs of ganja was recovered from the house of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no incriminating article has been recovered from the petitioner's house or his possession and he has been falsely implicated in the case. He is in custody since 24.1.2026 and has got no criminal antecedent.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State who submits that 25 kgs of ganja which happens to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30930 of 2026(3) dt.01-07-2026 2/2 be a commercial quantity, was recovered from the house of the petitioner. The article recovered has been confirmed to be ganja in the forensic science laboratory report dated 30.12.2025 issued under the signature of the Assistant Director, Regional Forensic Science Laboratory, Bhagalpur.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegation of recovery of 25 kgs of ganja which is a commercial quantity and the same having been confirmed in the report of the forensic science laboratory, the Court is not inclined to enlarge petitioner on bail and the application is rejected.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Bibhash/Amit U T