Md. Sakil v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44207 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-941 Year-2023 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District- Araria ====================================================== Md. Sakil SON OF MD. JAMSHED ALAM R/O Kairipur, Bishanpur, Police Station -Kochadhaman, District Kishanganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

SAIRA BANU WIFE OF MD. SAKIL, D/O MD. SAMRUDDIN R/O NANDANPUR, P.S.- BOUNSI, DIST- ARARIA ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kundan Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Damodar Prasad Tiwary, APP For the O.P. No.2 :

Mr. Madhav Jha, Advocate Mr. Kanchan Jha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 16-06-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party no.2.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case no.941C of 2023 registered under Sections 498A and 323 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per complaint, the complainant states that her marriage was solemnized with the petitioner in the year 2010. After some years of marriage, all accused persons including the petitioner herein started to assault her mentally and physically on account of non-fulfillment of demand of dowry and ultimately ousted her from matrimonial house.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44207 of 2024(8) dt.16-06-2025 2/2 allegations against the petitioner are false and concocted. The matter had earlier gone before the Patna High Court Mediation Centre, however, the mediation process has failed.

5. Today, learned Advocates appearing on behalf of the parties jointly submitted that the matter has already been compromised between the parties in the learned Court below.

6. The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State. However, learned counsel for the opposite party has no objection to the same.

7. In view of the aforesaid facts of the case, it is directed that the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Complaint Case no.941C of 2023 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M, Araria/Successor Court, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S, 2023. (Soni Shrivastava, J) Harsh/- U T