← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./32965/2026allowed

Gurpreet Singh @ Gurupreat Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2026-05-08Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32965 of 2026 In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81064 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-976 Year-2025 Thana- MAHUA District- Vaishali ====================================================== Gurpreet Singh @ Gurupreat Singh son of Late Jagtar Singh Resident of Village -Shri Ram Nagar Colony DCM PS -Udyog Nagar Dist- Kota, Rajsthan ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Subhash Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nand Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 08-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. The present application has been filed for modification of the order dated 27.11.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 81064 of 2025 by which the petitioner was granted bail in connection with Mahua P.S. Case No. 976 of 2025 to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court with certain conditions.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32965 of 2026(2) dt.08-05-2026 2/3 order dated 27.11.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 81064 of 2025, petitioner along with other co-accused, Sarbjeet Singh was granted bail by this Court with certain conditions and one of those conditions being that one of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that mother and father of the petitioner has already died and there is no brother or sister of the petitioner and the petitioner is the sole member in his family. Learned counsel submits that due to non-availability of the close relative, bail bonds of the petitioner could not be furnished. Learned counsel, therefore, prays that the said condition may be modified accordingly.

4. Considering the submissions advanced on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the grounds mentioned in the present modification application, this Court finds sufficient cause for modification of the condition imposed vide order dated 27.11.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 81064 of 2025.

5. Accordingly, the order dated 27.11.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 81064 of 2025 is modified to the extent that the condition requiring one of the bailors to be an own/close family member of the petitioner is hereby waived. The rest part of the said order shall remain intact.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32965 of 2026(2) dt.08-05-2026 3/3

6. The modification application is, accordingly, allowed.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T