Deepak Ram @ Mangaru Ram v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31917 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1 Year-2025 Thana- SHIVSAGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== Deepak Ram @ Mangaru Ram Son of Nagadish Ram Resident of Village - Torani, P.S.- Sheosagar, District - Rohtas at Sasaram ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Rameshwar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms.Rina Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY ORAL ORDER 20-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sheosagar P.S. Case No. 01/2025 registered for the offences under Sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 109, 74, 352, 351(2) of B.N.S.S.
3. As per the prosecution case, petitioner along with others had assaulted the informant and his family members by means of lathi, danda and iron rod as a result of which they sustained injuries.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel further submits that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. Learned counsel
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31917 of 2025(2) dt.20-05-2025 2/3 further submits that injuries sustained by two persons were simple in nature while two persons namely Kundan Kumar and Kusum Kumari have sustained grievous injury but they were inflicted on non-vital part of the body. Learned counsel further submits that there is land dispute between the parties and there is case and counter case between them. Learned counsel further submits that similarly situated co-accused persons vide orders dated 01.05.2025 and 16.05.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. Nos. 31694/205 and 23396/2025 have been granted anticipatory bail by coordinate benches of this Court. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has clean antecedent and is languishing in custody since 10.01.2025.
5. Learned counsel for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner, let the petitioner above-named be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Sheosagar P.S. Case No. 01/2025 subject to the conditions :-
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31917 of 2025(2) dt.20-05-2025 3/3 a. One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his close relative.
b. The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each date of the trial.
c. In case of absence on two consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to the cancelled by the court concerned.
d. The Court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the aforementioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
(Sourendra Pandey, J) tusharika/- U T