Sanjay Pandit v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29865 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-457 Year-2018 Thana- JAMUI District- Jamui ====================================================== Sanjay Pandit S/o Maleshwari Pandit Resident of Kakan, P.S.- Jamui, District- Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Satya Prakash Parasar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Ram Sevak Choudhary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 18-07-2019 This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Jamui P.S. Case No. 457 of 2018, disclosing offence under Sections 302/34 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
Allegation as per the written report is that the husband of the informant along with his grand son came to village home for living and started demand for partition. In the mean time one co-accused Shankar Pandit damaged the wall and encroached the land. In that reasons a case had been lodged and a partition case had also been lodged. It is further alleged that Sanjay Pandit threatened her husband of that consequence further case is that on the date of occurrence while her husband was sitting at his Darwaja the petitioner and other accused persons came and started abusing and the petitioner fired on her husband which
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29865 of 2019(3) dt.18-07-2019 2/2 caused series injuries.
Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that from the investigation it has come that the some others had killed the deceased and the petitioner has falsely been implicated due to the land dispute between the parties. Heard learned A.P.P. who opposed the prayer for bail on the ground that the direct allegation against the petitioner which supported by the postmortem report.
Having heard both sides in the view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. With the aforesaid, this application is dismissed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Rahul/- U T