Kumud Ranjan v. Piyush Ranjan And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CIVIL REVISION No.228 of 2016 In CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.343 of 2016 ====================================================== Kumud Ranjan, Son of Sachidanand Tiwari, resident of Village-Arap, P.S.- Vikram, District-Patna, At present resident of Mohalla-Mithapur "B" Area, P.S.-Jakkanpur, District-Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. Piyush Ranjan, Son of Sachidanand Tiwari, resident of Village-Arap, P.S.- Vikram, District-Patna, At present resident of Mohalla-Mithapur "B" Area, P.S.-Jakkanpur, District-Patna

2. Shri Sachidanand Tiwari, Son of Late Ram Narain Tiwari, resident of Village-Arap, P.S.-Vikram, District-Patna, At present resident of MohallaMithapur "B" Area, P.S.-Jakkanpur, District-Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Advocate Mr. Rajesh Ranjan, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 12-08-2022 This matter has been listed today for consideration through Video Conferencing.

This Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 25.04.2016 passed by the learned Sub-Judge Ist, Patna in Title Partition Suit No. 96 of 2015.

Mr. Rajesh Ranjan, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this Revision

Patna High Court C.R. No.228 of 2016(11) dt.12-08-2022 2/2 Petition with liberty to raise the issue of non-joinder of necessary party at the time of final hearing of the partition suit. Permission is granted.

In view of the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) kamlesh/- U