Md. Asruddin Ansari @ Asruddin Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35967 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-14 Year-2024 Thana- BASOPATTI District- Madhubani ====================================================== MD. ASRUDDIN ANSARI @ ASRUDDIN ANSARI SON OF MD. MOSTAKIM MOMIN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - HARNE, P.S. - HARLAKHI, DISTRICT - MADHUBANI ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Gagan Deo Yadav, Advocate :

Mr.Vinod Kumar, Advocate :

Mr.Udeshya Kumar Yadav, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mithlesh Kumar Khare, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 20-05-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Basopatti P.S. case No. 14 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Sections 379, 511 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Prosecution case, in short, is that, this petitioner was caught stealing the motorcycle of the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case merely on suspicion. No incriminating/looted article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that petitioner has not committed the offence

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35967 of 2024(2) dt.20-05-2024 2/2 of stealing the motorcycle, the mere fact of the case is that, the informant on the basis of suspicion caught this petitioner and, therefore, the present case has been lodged against him. Learned counsel further submitted that petitioner has got no concern with the motorcycle in question. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 10.02.2024 and has no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, clean antecedent as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Basopatti P.S. case No. 14 of 2024.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T