← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./30626/2019bail granted

Raj Kapoor @ Raj Kapoor Sah @ Raj Kapoor Kumar Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2019-05-09Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30626 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-38 Year-2018 Thana- KATRAHA District- Vaishali ====================================================== RAJ KAPOOR @ RAJ KAPOOR SAH @ RAJ KAPOOR KUMAR SAH Son of Late Julum Sah Resident of Village - Patepur, P.S.- Kartaha, Distt - Vaishali.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajeev Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Sevak Choudhary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 09-05-2019 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Kartahan P.S. Case No. 38/2018, instituted for offence under Section(s) 414 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 25(1-b)a, 26(ii) of Arms Act.

It is alleged in the written report that one loaded country made pistol and a cartridge have been recovered from possession of this petitioner.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is in custody since 11.06.2018.

Keeping in view the period of custody spent by the petitioner, prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail is allowed.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30626 of 2019(2) dt.09-05-2019 2/2 Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Vth, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with Kartahan P.S. Case No. 38/2018, subject to the conditions that (I) both the bailors shall be the close relative of the petitioner.

(II) Petitioner shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without valid reason will result in cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner and (III) if petitioner tamper with the evidence in the case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) rakhi/- U T