Raushan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33189 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-412 Year-2024 Thana- NATHNAGAR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Raushan Yadav S/o Sikander Yadav R/o Village- Gosidaspur, P.S.- Nathnagar, Dist..- Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Rajive Ranjan Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. B.N. Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 22-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Nathnagar P.S. Case No. 412 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Section 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 118(1), 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with others on being armed with weapon started abusing and assaulting the informant. It is further alleged that the younger brother of the informant, namely, Anikesh Kumar came to rescue the informant, then the petitioner assaulted with iron rod on his left hand due to which his left hand was fractured.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33189 of 2025(2) dt.22-05-2025 2/3 petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. It has also been submitted that the occurrence is of 12.11.2024 whereas the fardbeyan was recorded on 14.11.2024 and the injured went for treatment on that day only. It has further been submitted that the petitioner and informant are agnate and there is land dispute between the parties. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 09.02.2025.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and he submits that he has got one criminal antecedent.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. 1st, Bhagalpur in connection with Nathnagar P.S. Case No. 412 of 2024.
7. Before parting, I would like to suggest the Trial court that while considering the bail of a specific accused, the injuries received by all the victims should not be taken into
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33189 of 2025(2) dt.22-05-2025 3/3 consideration rather the specific allegation against the applicant/petitioner and injuries caused should be considered. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Anushka/- U T