Rohan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41642 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-518 Year-2020 Thana- DANAPUR District- Patna ====================================================== ROHAN KUMAR Son of Vinod Kumar Gupta Resident of Mohala- Jhakhri Mahadev, R.K. Choubey Road, P.S.- Danapur, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sumeet Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Raj Kishore Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 18-05-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is a case of shot fire upon the informant due to which the informant sustained gun shot injury by the petitioner. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner has got clean antecedent.

However, learned APP for the State opposed the anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that there is direct allegation of shot fire by the petitioner which hit on the left leg of the informant.

Considering the aforesaid facts, I am not inclined to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41642 of 2021(3) dt.18-05-2022 2/2 grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Brajesh Kumar/- U T