← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./30491/2019dismissed

Pankaj Jha v. The State Of Bihar

2019-05-13Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30491 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-274 Year-2018 Thana- ALAMNAGAR DistrictMadhepura ====================================================== PANKAJ JHA, aged about 30 years, male, S/o Pramod Jha R/o villageChainpur, P.S.- Chainpur, District- Saharsa, At present village- Khurhan, P.S.- Alamnagar, District- Madhepura ... ... Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Alok Kumar Singh, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party:

APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 13-05-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 304B, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Alamnagar P.S. Case No. 274 of 2018.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and as a matter of fact his wife has consumed some poisonous substance leading to her death, as she wanted to join the petitioner at Delhi where he was doing job but the petitioner was not ready to take her to Delhi. It is submitted that there is no eye witness to the occurrence and the petitioner was not present at the time of occurrence as he was at his work place at Delhi.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30491 of 2019(2) dt.13-05-2019 2/2 The informant has participated in the funeral rites of the deceased where her in-laws were also present. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Learned APP opposes the anticipatory bail petition, submitting that the petitioner is the husband of the deceased and her body has not been recovered.

5. Having regard to the nature of accusations and the gravity of the offence alleged, this Court is not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed.

(Vikash Jain, J) Ibrar/BT U T