Patna High CourtCR. MISC./30376/2025bail granted

Deepak Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-07-11Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30376 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-116 Year-2024 Thana- SHERGHATI District- Gaya ====================================================== Deepak Kumar S/o Gopal Paswan R/o Village- Kauavar (Kauabar), P.S.- Dobhi, Dist.- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Uday Chand Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case in connection with Sherghati P.S. Case No. 116 of 2024 dated 14.02.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/s 395 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, four unknown miscreants are alleged to have stopped the vehicle of the informant and looted Rs. 1,50,000/- and a mobile phone from the informant and a mobile phone was also looted from the informant's driver.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner has sprung up in the confessional statement of the co-accused, Pappu

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30376 of 2025(2) dt.11-07-2025 2/2 Kumar who has already been granted bail by this court vide order dated 31.07.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 50300 of 2024. No T.I.P. has been conducted by the prosecution. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no concern with the alleged offence. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the anticipatory bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned, Sherghati, Gaya in connection with Sherghati P.S. Case No. 116 of 2024, subject to conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of the BNSS.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) guddukr/- U T