Nitesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3637 of 2016 ====================================================== Nitesh Kumar Son of Sita Ram Yadav Resident of Village Sargawan, P.s - Deo , District Aurangabad Bihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

Secretary , Primary Education ,Education Department Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Director,Primary Education, Government of Bihar,Patna 4.

The District Magistrate, Aurangabad.

5.

The District Education , Aurangabad.

6.

The District Programme Officer, Establishment , Aurangabad. 7.

The Block Development Officer, Aurangabad.

8.

The Block Education Officer, Aurangabad.

9.

The Mukhiya Gram Panchayat , Sargawan, Deo District Aurangabad. 10.

The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Sargawan, Deo District Aurangabad,.

11.

Sushma Kumari Daughter of Shideshwar Singh Resident of Village- Kesor , Deo District Aurangabad.

12.

Krishna Murari Son of Balgovind Sharma Resident of Village Purani Bazar, Barbigha District Sheikhpura.

13.

Sanjeev Kumar Singh son of Gupta Singh Resident of Village- New Area Aurangabad, P.s Aurangabad District Aurangabad. 14.

Sangeeta Kumar Wife of Shashi Bhushan kumar Resident of Village Bhagwanbigha P.s Daudnagar, District Aurangabad. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Md. Kamaluddin For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Raghwendra Kumar, SC 22 Mr. Vikramaditya, AC to SC 22 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 29-03-2024

1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties concerned.

2. In view of the notification, dated 04.01.2024, bearing Memo No. 11, this writ application is disposed with a

Patna High Court CWJC No.3637 of 2016(4) dt.29-03-2024 2/2 liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal against the order passed by the District Teachers Appointment Appellate Authority before the Regional Deputy Director Education within a period of one month from today.

3. If such an appeal is filed, the Regional Deputy Director Education shall be obliged to consider the same in accordance with law.

4. Accordingly, the present writ application is disposed with the aforesaid direction.

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J.) Prabhakar Anand/- U √