M/S Scientific Ayurvedic Research And Production Laboratory, v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7504 of 2025 ====================================================== M/S Scientific Ayurvedic Research and Production Laboratory, Zero Mile, Jakariapur, Patna-800007, Being Represented through its Proprietor, Ajay Kuamr, Male, aged about-52 Years, Son of Sri Arjun Prasad Modi, Resident of C/ 304, Charminar Apartment, Road No-12, Rajendra Nagar, Patna, Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Health and Family Welfare, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.
The Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Health and Family Welfare, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3.
State Ayush Society, Room No.-347, 3rd Floor, Vikas Bhawan, Baily Road, Health Department, Government of Bihar, Patna Being Represented through the Executive Director.
4.
The Executive Director, State Ayush Society, Health Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
5.
The State Program Officer, State Ayush Society, Health Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Avinash Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. P.K Shahi, Advocate General ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) 06-05-2025 Mr. Avinash Kumar, the learned counsel for the petitioner, after some arguments, seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition in order to enable the petitioner to agitate his grievance before the concerned administrative department empowered to look into the procurement related complaints relating to the procuring
Patna High Court CWJC No.7504 of 2025(2) dt.06-05-2025 2/2 entity as defined in the Bihar Purchase Preference Policy, 2024.
2. In case such a complaint is made before the authority concerned, the authority shall pass a speaking order and would make the petitioner know of it as expeditiously as possible.
3. The writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
(Ashutosh Kumar, ACJ) ( Partha Sarthy, J) Shiv/sunil U