Deoshree Rakshit v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31426 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-60 Year-2026 Thana- JAMALPUR District- Munger ====================================================== Deoshree Rakshit D/o Late Manoj Kumar Roy Resident of Village- Bari Dariyapur, P.S.- Jamalpur, Distt.- Munger ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kumar Kamal Nayan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Renu Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 22-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Jamalpur P.S. Case No. 60 of 2026 instituted for the offences under Sections 103(1), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. Prosecution case, in short, is that the son of the informant was found lying unconscious near the street, thereafter, he was rushed to the hospital where he was declared brought dead.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31426 of 2026(3) dt.22-07-2026 2/3 petitioner is an innocent lady and has falsely been implicated in the present case merely on the basis of suspicion. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that general and omnibus allegation has been made against the petitioner. No specific overt act is alleged against the petitioner. There is case and counter case between the parties. Learned counsel further submitted that except the self-confessional statement of the petitioner, there is no material against the petitioner to show her involvement in the alleged occurrence. He further contended that confessional statement before police has no evidentiary value in the eye of law. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 15.03.2026 and has no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, petitioner being lady as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31426 of 2026(3) dt.22-07-2026 3/3 below/concerned Court in connection with Jamalpur P.S. Case No. 60 of 2026.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T