Kalpnath Yadav @ Kalpnath Rai v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.61854 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-187 Year-2018 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Kalpnath Yadav @ Kalpnath Rai S/o Garjan Yadav, R/o village SipayaTola, P.S. Bishambharpur, District Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Khurshid Anwar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 04-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
The prosecution case, in short, is that 881.280 liters wine is recovered.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has transpired as the alleged recovery is made from the cattle house belonging to the joint family of the petitioner. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.61854 of 2018(2) dt.04-10-2018 2/2 in this case. It is alleged that 881.280 liters wine is recovered from the cattle house in question. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R./complaint case.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Excise, Gopalganj in connection with Excise case No.187 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T