← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./34808/2024bail granted

Manish Kumar Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2024-05-07Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34808 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-51 Year-2024 Thana- BARAHAT District- Banka ====================================================== 1.

Manish Kumar Ram Son of Sikandar Ram @ Sikendra Ram Resident of Village - Kadwa, Police Station - Kadwa, District - Naugachia (Bhagalpur). 2.

Mukesh Kumar Son of Lalu Ram Resident of Village - Delar Jewaspur, Police Station - Gamhariya, District - Madhepura. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ranjeet Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-05-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Barahat P.S. Case No. 51 of 2024 (Special Excise Case No. 189 of 2024) dated 01.03.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/s 30(a) of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, total 113.4 litres of illicit foreign liquor was recovered from a tempo without registration number driven by the petitioner no. 1 and the petitioner no. 2 was also sitting there.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34808 of 2024(2) dt.07-05-2024 2/2 that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioners are not the owner of the said tempo. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioners. The petitioners have clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioners have been made accused in this case on the basis of suspicion. The petitioners are in custody since 01.03.2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition of the petitioners.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of their custody, the petitioners above-named, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Banka in connection with Barahat P.S. Case No. 51 of 2024 (Special Excise Case No. 189 of 2024)

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Ranjeet/- U T