Badhahu Bhuiyan @ Pintu Bhuiyan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32558 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-47 Year-2026 Thana- DEV District- Aurangabad ====================================================== 1.
Badhahu Bhuiyan @ Pintu Bhuiyan, son of Late Shyam Sundar Bhuiyan, Resident of village- Belsara, PS- Deo, District- Aurangabad 2.
Hareram Bhuiyan @ Hare Ram, son of Mahand Bhuiyan @ Mahang Bhuiyan, Resident of village- Belsara, PS- Deo, District- Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Shailesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 18-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners have prayed for regular bail in connection with Deo P.S. Case No. 47 of 2026 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 103(i), 3(5) of the B.N.S.
3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the younger brother of the informant was killed in the village of his wife.
4. Learned counsel of the petitioners has submitted that the relationship between the deceased and his wife was strained one. On 16.02.2026, the wife of the deceased, Priyanka Kumari and the mother-in-law of the deceased took the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32558 of 2026(2) dt.18-05-2026 2/3 deceased to their village and on 18.02.2026, the informant received the information that his brother has been killed. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has further been submitted that the petitioners are not the in-laws of the deceased neither their name is there in the F.I.R. From perusal of the order of the learned trial court it transpired that the learned trial court has recorded that from perusal of the case diary in para 20, 21 and para 22, it appears that the co-accused persons Ganesh Bhuiyan and Chandmuni Devi, who are the father and mother of Priyanka Devi and Priyanka Devi herself confessed about the commission of murder of the deceased and the involvement of the petitioners in the alleged crime.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the name of these petitioners have surfaced during investigation in the confessional statement of the in-laws of the deceased, save and except the confessional statement, there is nothing against them. They are just the covillagers of Priyanka Devi. Petitioners are having no criminal antecedent. They are in custody since 20.02.2026.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32558 of 2026(2) dt.18-05-2026 3/3 inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Aurangabad, in connection with Deo P.S. Case No. 47 of 2026. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) khushbu/- U