← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./58795/2018bail granted

Nawal Kishore Ram @ Nawal Kishor Ram And ORS v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2018-09-19Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.58795 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1009 Year-2013 Thana- KATIHAR COMPLAINT CASE District- Katihar ======================================================

1. Nawal Kishore Ram @ Nawal Kishor Ram son of Chhote Lal Ram

2. Uma Devi wife of Nawal Kishore Ram

3. Raj Kishore alias Raj Kishor son of Nawal Kishore Ram alias Nawal Kishor All residents of Mohalla - Nitibag, Post Office - Munger, Police Station - Kotwali, District - Munger. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Kiran Devi wife of Late Bimal Kishor Ram resident of Mohalla - Larkania Tola, Ward No. 19, P.O. + P.S. - Katihar, District - Katihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Madhu Prasun For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Abhay Kumar - 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioners is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The petitioners are in-laws. They have falsely been

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.58795 of 2018(2) dt.19-09-2018 2/2 implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioners have relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in connection with C.A. Case No. 1009/2013, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T