← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./31359/2025bail granted

Siyaram Kumar @ Siyaram Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-14Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31359 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-58 Year-2025 Thana- TANKUPPA District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

Siyaram Kumar @ Siyaram Yadav S/O Baldev Prasad @ Baldev Yadav R/O Village- Charka Pathar, P.S- Fatehpur, Distt.- Gaya. 2.

Sachin Kumar S/O Arjun Yadav R/O Village- Sabal Chak, P.S- Tankuppa, Dist.- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sudhir Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Yogendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 14-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Tankuppa P.S. Case No. 58 of 2025 dated 28.03.2025 registered for the offences punishable u/s 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, total 150 litres of illicit country made liquor was recovered from the car.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioners are neither the driver nor the owner of the said vehicle. The petitioners were working as

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31359 of 2025(2) dt.14-05-2025 2/2 liners. The petitioners have no concern with the alleged recovery. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioners have one criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioners are in custody since 29.03.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioners.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioners above-named, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Gaya in connection with Tankuppa P.S. Case No. 58 of 2025.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) guddukr/- U T