Patna High CourtCR. MISC./32380/2025bail granted

Sachin Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-20Justice Smt. Soni Shrivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32380 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-84 Year-2025 Thana- EKMA District- Saran ====================================================== Sachin Kumar son of Hareram Mahto Village - Rampur Bindalal, P. S - Ekma , District - Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Hemant Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 20-05-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. A prayer for bail has been made on behalf of the petitioner in connection with Ekma P.S. Case no.84 of 2025 registered under section 317(5) of B.N.S, 2023.

3. The allegation in the F.I.R is that a stolen scooty bearing Registration No. BR0453846 was recovered from the house of the petitioner. He was apprehended by the police and on asking for the documents of the said scooty, no relevant document would be shown by him.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case since he had some dispute with the police personnel. He further submits that no independent witness is there on the seizure list further

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32380 of 2025(2) dt.20-05-2025 2/2 indicating violation of mandatory provisions of the B.N.S.S. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that there is no allegation of being involved in the theft of scooty, however, during investigation it was found that a vehicle theft case was also lodged earlier as Kopa P.S. Case No. 229 of 2023. However, it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner had no knowledge that the scooty was stolen one. The petitioner is in custody since 03.03.2024 and undertakes to cooperate in the case/trial.

5. The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.

6. Taking into consideration the above mentioned facts of the case and also considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 03.03.2025, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Ekma P.S. Case no.84 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Saran at Chhapar.

(Soni Shrivastava, J) Harsh/- U T