Legal Manager, Bharti Axa General Insurance Company Limited v. Champa Devi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Appeal No.368 of 2025 ====================================================== Legal Manager, Bharti Axa General Insurance Company Limited @ ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Limited Kalpana Arcade Building, 1st Floor, Bazar Samiti Road, Bahadurpur, Patna- 800006, Appeal and appellant through Authorized Signatory / Duly Constituted Attorney, ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Limited, 2nd Floor. Krishna Bhawan, Above Axis Bank, Near Dakbanglow Chauraha, Patna-1. ... ... Appellant/s
Versus
1.
Champa Devi Wife of Dinanath Singh, Resident of Village- Banwar Tola, P.S.- Daudpur, District- Saran.
2.
Jagmohan Yadav @ Jagmohan Singh Yadav @ Manmohan Yadav, Son of Bhuneshwar Yadav @ Bhuneshwar Singh Yadav, Resident of VillageDevanpura, P.S.- Simri, District- Buxar. 3.
Dinbandhu Singh, Son of Dinanath Singh Resident of Village- Banwar Tola, P.S.- Daudpur, District- Saran.
4.
Santosh Kumar Singh, Son of Dinanath Singh Resident of Village- Banwar Tola, P.S.- Daudpur, District- Saran.
5.
Niraj Kumar Singh, Son of Dinanath Singh Resident of Village- Banwar Tola, P.S.- Daudpur, District- Saran.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s :
Mr. Durgesh Kumar Singh, Adv.
For the Respondent/s :
Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 25-09-2025 Heard the parties.
2. The present application has been preferred for the following relief(s):
Being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the Judgment/Award dated 28.06.2024, passed by Sri Suresh Kumar Srivastava, Additional District and Sessions Judge-9th-Cum- Presiding Officer- CumMotor Vehicle Accident Claim Tribunal,
Patna High Court MA No.368 of 2025(3) dt.25-09-2025 2/2 Saran at Chapra (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal), in M.V. Claim Case no. 155 / 2019 'Champa Devi v/s Legal Manager, ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Limited and Ors.' by which compensation has been allowed against the appellant.
3. Mr. Durgesh Kumar Singh has prayed for withdrawal of the petition.
4. Accordingly, the same is dismissed as withdrawn.
5. The statutory amount, if any, has to be returned to the appellant.
(Rajiv Roy, J) Vijay Singh/- U