Ramayan Bhagat v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31167 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-33 Year-2019 Thana- RAJEPUR District- East Champaran ====================================================== Ramayan Bhagat Son of Dagar Bhagat Resident of Village - Tetaria, P.S.- Rajpur, Distt - East Champaran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Arun Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 10-05-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
In this case, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Rajepur P.S. Case No. 33 of 2019, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30 (A) of Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act.
The police has recovered 2 litres of country made liquor from the house of the petitioner, however, after seeing the police he succeeded to flee away. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent.
Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above-named, be released on anticipatory
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31167 of 2019(2) dt.10-05-2019 2/2 bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge-VII-cum-Special Judge, Excise Act, East Champaran at Motihari, in connection with Rajepur P.S. Case No. 33 of 2019, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with a further condition that if the petitioner, after his release in this case, is again found involved in similar nature of cases then the concerned court would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. Further condition is that whenever the police will call the petitioner for the purposes of investigation and interrogation, he will remain present for the investigation. In the event of being absent on two consecutive dates without reasonable explanation, the present order will be treated to have been cancelled.
(Shivaji Pandey, J) V.K.Pandey/ S. Katyayan/- U T