Angrej Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33750 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-19 Year-2025 Thana- BIND District- Nalanda ====================================================== Angrej Yadav S/o Late Chando Yadav R/o Vill.- Madanchak, P.S.- Bind, Distt.- Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Raj Kishor Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mrs. Suman Kumari Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 20-05-2025 Heard Mr. Raj Kishor Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. Suman Kumari Singh, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Bind P.S. Case No. 19 of 2025 for the offence under sections 109, 132, 121(1) of the B.N.S. and Sections 30(a), 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022, lodged on 24.01.2025 by the informant, Santosh Kumar.
3. As per the prosecution story, the police upon secret information intercepted a motorcycle and there is recovery/seizure of 30 litres country made liquor. The person apprehended is/was Ram Kripal Yadav who gave the name of other persons as Vijendra Yadav as the owner of the motorcycle
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33750 of 2025(2) dt.20-05-2025 2/3 and Sujit Kumar. This led to the FIR.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the name of the petitioner has cropped up on the confession of the arrested person that he was the person who escaped. The petitioner does not own the motorcycle, his name has come in the confessional statement but has criminal antecedent.
5. Learned APP opposes the prayer submitting that the name has cropped up by the person arrested.
6. Taking into account the submissions of the parties as also that nothing has been recovered from his conscious possession, in that background, this Court is inclined to extend him the privilege of anticipatory bail with conditions.
7. Let the petitioner be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the receipt of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned District & Additional Session Judge-Vcum-Special Judge Excise-1, Nalanda in connection with Bind P.S. Case No.19 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
(i) one of the bailor should be the family member/relative of the petitioner who shall provide official
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33750 of 2025(2) dt.20-05-2025 3/3 document to show his/her bona fide;
(ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his bail bond by the Trial Court itself;
(iii) the petitioner shall appear before the concerned police station every fortnight for next one year to mark his attendance;
(iv) the petitioner shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds;
(v) the petitioner shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. (Rajiv Roy, J) anand/- U T