← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./42060/2021dismissed

Suman Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2022-02-17Mr. Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42060 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-81 Year-2021 Thana- PATORI District- Samastipur ====================================================== Suman Devi, aged about 26 years, Female W/o Mritunjay Mahto @ Mritunjay Kumar, Resident of Village - Hassanpur Surat, P.S.- Patory, DistrictSamastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bharat Bhushan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA ORAL ORDER 17-02-2022 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner through video conferencing.

The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in connection with Patory P.S. Case No. 81 of 2021 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 147,148,149,341, 323,325,307,458 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The case was taken up earlier on 16.12.2021, wherein the Court had passed an order of no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner. On 10.02.2022, the Court again took up the matter and prayer was made by counsel for the petitioner to put up the matter today. Today, learned counsel for the petitioner is not appearing. Case diary has been received. Learned counsel appearing for the informant

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42060 of 2021(4) dt.17-02-2022 2/2 opposes adjournment in the case.

Learned counsel informs that this is a case where death has been committed by murder. As per the case diary, the petitioner and others have been involved in causing injuries and are part of the unlawful assembly.

Having considered the submissions carefully and gone through the case diary, it is apparent that the petitioner and others being part of the unlawful assembly and have beaten up the deceased person and also other members of the family. Considering the overall aspect, the role of the petitioner being a lady is also noticed in the case diary. In the circumstances, I do not deem it fit to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

This application is dismissed.

(Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J) Anand Kr.

U T