Alok Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31531 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-22 Year-2025 Thana- KAMTAUL District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Alok Paswan, S/O Ram Gulam Paswan, R/O village - Dudhel, P.S. - Bisfi, Dist. - Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Virendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Arun Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 21-05-2025 Heard Mr. Virendra Kumar learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Arun Kumar Singh, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Kamtaul P.S. Case No. 22 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 132, 109, 310(5), 310(4) of B.N.S. and Sections 25(1-B)a, 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that police received information that certain miscreants are arriving with an intention to commit loot. It is further alleged that when the police reached at the place of occurrence, six persons on two bikes started fleeing away. They were intercepted. They started firing. In counter police also fired. One of the accused persons received gun shot injury.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31531 of 2025(2) dt.21-05-2025 2/2 petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. It has further been submitted that from the possession of this petitioner, only a mobile has been recovered. Nothing incriminating article has been recovered from his possession. From perusal of the F.I.R., it is clear that the nature of allegation is general and omnibus. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 26.01.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Darbhanga in connection with Kamtaul P.S. Case No.22 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T