Rohit Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33669 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1553 Year-2022 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District- Banka ====================================================== ROHIT YADAV Son of Dhar Vaisar Yadav Resident of Village - Bandhudih, P.S.- Shambhuganj, District - Banka.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Bihar 2.

Rani Devi Daughter of Bharat Bhushan Yadav R/o Village - Dona, P.O.- Bacchappar, P.S.- Sajour, Distt.- Bhagalpur.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dhananjay Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Raj Ballabh Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 06-10-2023

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 1553 of 2022 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498A, 323, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section-3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

3. Petitioner is husband of opposite party no. 2 and both parties are ready to settle the dispute.

4. Without going into the merits of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on provisional

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33669 of 2023(3) dt.06-10-2023 2/3 anticipatory bail for a period of six months from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned trial court on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka in connection with Complaint Case No. 1553 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

4. The trial court is directed to make suitable effort for the purpose of conciliation between the parties.

5. The petitioner and the opposite party no. 2 would have the opportunity to work out an amicable resolution of the issue.

6. If an amicable resolution is worked out within six months, petitioner would be entitled to confirmation of his provisional anticipatory bail.

7. The provisional anticipatory bail of the petitioner will be confirmed by learned trial court in three eventualities (i) if the matrimonial harmony is substantially restored (ii) if the complainant fails to appear before the learned trial court or (iii) if the complainant gets reluctant to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33669 of 2023(3) dt.06-10-2023 3/3 reconcile the issue.

8. With the aforesaid observation, this petition stands disposed of.

(Alok Kumar Pandey, J) vashudha/- U T