Ramsewak Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31285 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-360 Year-2024 Thana- CHIRAIYA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Ramsewak Ram Son of Late Lagan Ram Resident of village - Semara Sagardina, P.S.- Chiraiya, District - East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Abhishek Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 21-05-2025 Heard Mr. Abhishek Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Manoj Kumar, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Chiraiya P.S. Case No.360 of 2024, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the BNS.

3. The case of the prosecution is that one Rubi Devi (deceased) was married to Nitesh Ram three years ago. It is further alleged that she was subjected to cruelty on account of nonfulfilment of demant of motorcycle. The informant made many attempts to conciliate the matter but vain. On 11.09.2024, the informant received a call that Rubi Devi (deceased) has died. The police has also reached there. It is also alleged that for conciliating the evidence, the body was hanged on ceiling fan. It is further alleged that all the in-laws committed murder. The learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the petitioner is fatherin-law. The nature of allegation is general and omnibus. There is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31285 of 2025(2) dt.21-05-2025 2/2 no specific allegation against the petitioner and from post-mortem it has also transpired that the death was due to hanging.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 17.11.2024.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Chiraiya P.S. Case No.360 of 2024.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Saurav/- U T