The Managing Committee Baldeo Sanskrit High School And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13378 of 2013 ======================================================
1. The Managing Committee Baldeo Sanskrit High School Masaurhi, Patna Through Its Secretary Namely Arbind Kumar Son Of Late Das Yadav Resident Of Village Kafarpur, Police Station - Makhdumpur, District - Jehanabad
2. Vinod Kumar Son Of Late Ram Govind Singh Resident Of Village Taregna, Police Station Masaurhi, District Patna, Assistant Teacher In Baldeo Sanskrit High School, Masaurhi, Patna
3. Sati Kant Majumdar @ Shahsi Kant Majumdar Son Of Amiya Kumar Majumdar R/O Moh - Murcha Road P.S. Chowk Patna City Distt - Patna, Assistant Teacher In Baldeo Sanskrit High School, Masaurhi, Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar
2. The Principal Secretary, Secondary Education, Bihar, Patna
3. The Special Director, Secondary Education, Bihar, Patna
4. The Chairman Bihar Sanskrit Education Board, Patna
5. The Secretary Bihar Sanskrit Education Board, Patna
6. The District Education Officer, Patna ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Binod Kumar For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Anuj Kumar, AC to GP-24 For Board :
Mr. S.S. Sundram, Advocate Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 31-07-2018 Learned counsel for the petitioners informs the Court that grievance of the petitioner nos. 2 and 3 has been redressed and as such the present writ application is now confined to the writ petitioner no.1 as the writ petition on behalf of the petitioner nos. 2 and 3 has become infructuous. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the retirement of the petitioner nos. 1 and 2, the
Patna High Court CWJC No.13378 of 2013(8) dt.31-07-2018 2/2 petitioner no.1 may be given liberty to file fresh representation for redressal of his grievance before the Sanskrit Shiksha Board. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner no.1 to file fresh representation before the Sanskrit Shiksha Board and the Sanskrit Shikhsa Board is required to decide the representation in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.
With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Ravi/- U