Patna High CourtCR. MISC./35054/2024bail granted

Golu Kumar @ Vikash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-05-09Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35054 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-56 Year-2024 Thana- NOORSARAI District- Nalanda ====================================================== Golu Kumar @ Vikash Kumar Son of Surendra Kumar R/o village - Mogal Kuan, P.S. - Sohsarai, Dist.- Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Davendra Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Chandra Sen Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 09-05-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in Noorsarai P.S. Case No. 56 of 2024, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 384, 385, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that, petitioner along with others were checking and collecting money as Parivan Officer. On seeing the police they tried to flee away but the petitioner was apprehended on spot and on search 10 pumplet cards, one driving book and red sticker has been recovered.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35054 of 2024(2) dt.09-05-2024 2/2 petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner was a passerby of that way and police has arrested the petitioner on the basis of suspicion. The petitioner is in custody since 07.02.2024 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 100 of Cr.P.C.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Noorsarai P.S. Case No. 56 of 2024.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T