← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./31126/2025bail granted

Rohit Kumar @ Lucky v. The State Of Bihar

2025-12-02Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31126 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-525 Year-2023 Thana- GAURICHAK District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

Rohit Kumar @ Lucky S/O Dinesh Singh R/O Jhaua Basant, P.s.- Autar Nagar, Dist.- Saran 2.

Chandramauli Kumar S/O Kishundeo Singh R/O Vill.- Bahuara, P.s.- Gaurichak, Dist.- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Mithlesh Kumar Khare, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar @ S.K., Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02-12-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State and learned counsel for the informant.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 325 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per prosecution case, Petitioner No. 1 is alleged to have fired from his pistol in the air and Petitioner No. 2 is alleged to have assaulted one Birendra Singh with knife.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31126 of 2025(3) dt.02-12-2025 2/3

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. Petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case due to land dispute. Petitioner No. 1 is alleged to have fired in the air but no one has sustained any fire arm injury. So far as Petitioner No. 2 is concerned, doctor has found the injuries, allegedly caused by Petitioner No. 2, as simple in nature.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and nature of injuries allegedly caused by these petitioners, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed.

7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, VI, Patna in connection with Gaurichak P.S.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31126 of 2025(3) dt.02-12-2025 3/3 Case No. 525 of 2023, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S..

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T