Sushil Kumar Singh @ Sushil Singh And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

Patna High Court CWJC No.16028 of 2013 dt.11-09-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16028 of 2013 ===========================================================

1. Sushil Kumar Singh @ Sushil Singh Son Of Sri Awadhesh Kumar Singh Resident of Village and P.O.- Dumara Kala, P.S.- Majorganj, District- Sitamarhi

2. Baidnath Singh @ Baijnath Sah Son of Late Ishwar Prasad Singh Resident of Village and P.O.- Sonoul Mahoday, P.S.- Majorganj, District- Sitamarhi .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Old Secretariat, Patna

2. The Deputy Development Commissioner, District Rural Development Agency, Sitamarhi, District- Sitamarhi

3. The Block Development Officer, Majorganj, District- Sitamarhi

4. The District Magistrate, Sitamarhi, District- Sitamarhi

5. The District Certificate Officer, Sitamarhi, District- Sitamarhi .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. RAJEEV KUMAR LABH, ADVOCATE For the State : Mr. Rakesh Prabhat, AC to SC 21 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 11-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

2. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the notices, both dated 08.10.2012 issued by the District Certificate Officer, Sitamarhi in Certificate Case No. 06/2012-13 and 07/2012-13, respectively by which the petitioners have been directed to deposit rest amount of undistributed food grains lifted under the SGRY Scheme.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that pursuant to the orders of this Court, the Enquiry Commission headed by Hon'ble Mr. Justice

Patna High Court CWJC No.16028 of 2013 dt.11-09-2018 Udai Sinha (Retired) has now submitted its report and any further action in relation to recovery of the value of undistributed rice under the SGRY Scheme would abide by the decision of the State Government to be taken on the basis of such report.

4. In the above view of the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to approach this Court afresh as and when the occasion arises in future.

5. Having regard to the stand of the petitioner, the writ petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 13.09.2018 Transmission Date NA