← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/17081/2013dismissed

Manoj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-10-01Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17081 of 2013 =========================================================== Manoj Kumar Son Of Late Krishna Chandra Choudhary Resident Of MohallaImlichatti, P.S.- Brahampura, District- Muzaffarpur .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Commissioner, Tirahut Division, Muzaffarpur

2. The Collector, Muzaffarpur

3. The Branch Manager, Union Bank, Motijhil, P.S.- Town, District- Muzaffarpur .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. R.C. Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent-Bank : Mr. A. Sharan, Advocate Mr. Prabhat Kumar Sharan, Advocate Mr. Hemant Kumar Sharan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Madhukar Mishra, AC to SC-16 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 01-10-2018 The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 29.04.2013 passed in Certificate Appeal No. 9/2002-03 whereby and where under the respondent Commissioner directed the petitioner to pay the amount (certificate amount) to the Bank and as such confirmed the order dated 07.07.2001 of the learned Collector by which the order passed in Certificate Case No. 633/1993-94 on 03.11.1996 was set aside.

2. At the outset itself, learned counsel for the respondents invites reference to paragraph- 18 of the counter affidavit filed on 11.09.2018, stating that the petitioner has intentionally

Patna High Court CWJC No.17081 of 2013 dt.01-10-2018 2/2 suppressed the fact of having filed Title Suit No. 312 of 1995 for the similar allegations, which is yet pending before the Sub Judge-1st, Muzaffarpur.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner accepts that Title Suit No. 312 of 1995 is pending adjudication with regard to the connected dispute.

4. In the above circumstances, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter. The writ petition stands dismissed. (Vikash Jain, J) N.H./- Chandran AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date03-10-2018 Transmission Date N/A