Patna High CourtCWJC/1160/2017disposed

Most. Hirajhari Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-07-03Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1160 of 2017 ====================================================== Most. Hirajhari Devi w/o late Radha Mohan Singh, r/v-Hariharpur, P.O.- Bilauri, P.S. - Shahpur, District - Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

2. The Engineer-in-Chief-cum-Special Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Government of Bihar

3. The Chief Engineer (Mechanical) Public Health Engineering Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

4. The Superintending Engineer, Public Health, Mechanical Circle, Patna

5. The Executive Engineer, Public Health Mechanical Division, Sasaram

6. The District Provident Fund Officer, Rohtas at Sasaram

7. The Treasury Officer, Rohtas at Sasaram

8. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Surendra Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the A.G. : Mr. Dr. Anand Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kr.Giri-GP-9 Mr. Ajay Kumar AC to G.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 03-07-2019 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the State/respondents.

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking following relief:- (1.) for payment of retiral dues i.e. G.P.F., Gratuity and leave encashment.

Counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent nos. 1 to 5. In para 5 of the counter affidavit, statement has been made that entire pensionary benefits

Patna High Court CWJC No.1160 of 2017 dt.03-07-2019 2/2 including pension, gratuity, leave encashment, G.P.F. and Pay fixation has already been paid to the petitioner. On the last occasion, two weeks time was given to the petitioner to file reply to the counter affidavit. Today, it is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has no instruction as to whether payment has been made or not to the petitioner as the client is not in touch with him.

In the aforesaid facts and circumstances and in view of para 5 of the counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondent nos. 1 to 5, this writ petition is disposed of. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 05.07.2019 Transmission Date